Skip to content
← All case studies

Trademarks

Parallel imports as use of a mark in the territory

Supreme Court judgment establishing that parallel and unofficial-channel imports constitute use of a mark in Bangladesh — decisive for brands exposed to grey-market distribution.

Client
Confidential brand owner
Our role
Counsel
Led by
A.B.M. Shamsud Doulah, A.B.M. Sohailud Doulah

The problem

A registered mark can be attacked for non-use. For a brand whose goods reach Bangladesh mainly through parallel and unofficial import channels rather than an authorised local distributor, the question is whether that counts as use of the mark in the territory — and if it does not, the registration is vulnerable.

What we did

Argued the point to the Supreme Court of Bangladesh.

The outcome

The Court held that parallel and unofficial-channel imports constitute use of the mark in the territory.

The judgment protects registrations held by brands that have no authorised Bangladeshi distributor, and shapes how grey-market exposure is handled in non-use and rectification proceedings.

Check it

  • Citation and year to be confirmed by the firm before publication.